[ . . . ]
With almost youthful élan and undeviating resolve, the usually more cautious and reluctant Willy Brandt took control. He already took hold of the steering wheel on election night! Those who witnessed him at that time report that he “carried them away.” Walter Scheel had a similar aura. People said he left the impression of someone who acts “out of conviction.”
We were pervaded by phrases like “historical break,” “change in power,” “turning point in German history.” The parliament was filled with emotions; and many newspapers with visions and high expectations. This wave had been created especially by Brandt himself, who knew how to use it. He rode, if the image is fitting, his own wave.
His first policy statement was considered a coalition agreement. And it likely was one. It announced the will to make a totally new start. We’ve only just begun! We are just starting to press on with democracy!
We pricked up our critical ears. Brandt had just written in Neue Gesellschaft* [New Society] in May 1969 that “the CDU/CSU regards democracy as an organizational form of the state; the SPD regards democracy as a principle that must influence and permeate the entire social being of the people.”
That tore open fundamental rifts! “Democratization of all areas of life” – what is that supposed to mean? For the family, for the workplace, for science, for the media?
The new chancellor emphasized this sentence: “I view myself as chancellor, not of a defeated Germany, but a liberated one.” That marked the change in government with the “pathos of a new beginning”; Brandt’s impact also came from his “brilliant diction of speech.” Some people thought that the “emergency founding” of the Federal Republic of Germany was now being followed – in a “second zero hour” – by its “refounding.”
[ . . . ]
By now, we have become accustomed to democracy in Germany. Who can still recall the significance of the change from Adenauer to Erhard, from Kiesinger to Brandt, for our young democracy and for the image of a democratic Germany abroad, and what it meant for us too? A positive view of us abroad was the prerequisite for all hopes of reunification.
* A political and cultural magazine published by the Friedrich Ebert Foundation of the SPD. – eds.